the trouble with hormones

Instapundit has a link to the danger of brain tumors to birth control hormones. the discus discussion is quite interesting. 

 You know, what no one wants to notice: How the hormones in Birth Control pills cause behavior changes. 

The older high estrogen pills not so much but the newer high progesterone ones and the BCShot does. 

And don't get me started on the hormones they use for infertility and endometriosis, which we see in older ladies who haven't had babies in their twenties.

Yes the same medicines they use to transition kids.(and treat certain cancers). 

So we pollute out water supply with waste water estrogen, not to mention hormones given to animals, and of course phytoestrogens in plastics and Glyphosate in herbicides. So down goes the sperm count. Up goes the metabolic syndrome and obesity.

But on the other hand, the alternative is having ten kids and getting rid of plastics which make life easier and safer (No broken glass bottles). 

And mass starvation because weeds are destroying the crops.
Sigh. 

Naltrexone: A new wonder drug?

 

this sounds like the discoveries about Ivermectin and cancer and against viral diseases.

and I had complicated Dengue with neurological and hematological changes but was not given anything but fluid. 

since this is alternative medicine I couldn't find anything about Naltrexone and viral diseases like Dengue via google.

Could Ivermectin have helped? a 2020 paper suggests maybe. but it didn't change clinical outcome. 

adenovirus emhanced Ebola vaccine

 

Ebola part two

 

Ebola again: But this time with hysteria by the WHO to raise money

  WHO Declares Ebola Outbreak in Congo, Uganda a Global Health Emergency.

a previous ebola outbreaks were isolated and stopped using hygiene, testing of the local population, isolation of contacts, ring vaccinations.
none were mRNA.
https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/ebola-vaccines
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7316a1.htm
Most Yanks know nothing about these previous outbreaks
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-05/democratic-republic-of-congo-ebola-outbreak/105739008

why didn't they just quarantine the infected passengers?

quarantine has been used for hundreds of years to stop infectious diseases from jumping off ships. 

 So why didn't government quarantine these rich passengers when the Hant virus hit? 

 Why did they let them go home and now we see hysteria about a not very infectious disease that has spread (artificially) all over the world?

the history of quarantine

 LINK

The concept of ‘quarantine’ is embedded in health practices, attracting heightened interest during episodes of epidemics. The term is strictly related to plague and dates back to 1377, when the Rector of the seaport of Ragusa (then belonging to the Venetian Republic) officially issued a 30-day isolation period for ships, that became 40 days for land travellers. During the next 100 years similar laws were introduced in Italian and in French ports, and they gradually acquired other connotations with respect to their original implementation. Measures analogous to those employed against the plague have been adopted to fight against the disease termed the Great White Plague, i.e. tuberculosis, and in recent times various countries have set up official entities for the identification and control of infections. Even more recently (2003) the proposal of the constitution of a new European monitoring, regulatory and research institution has been made, since the already available system of surveillance has found an enormous challenge in the global emergency of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In the absence of a targeted vaccine, general preventive interventions have to be relied upon, including high healthcare surveillance and public information. Quarantine has, therefore, had a rebound of celebrity and updated evidence strongly suggests that its basic concept is still fully valid.